        |
The Drug-AIDS
Hypothesis Note: The information on this website is presented for
educational purposes and This document was provided by 2. WHY HIV-AIDS SCIENCE CANNOT SUCCEED 2.1. The American/European AIDS epidemic. The AIDS epidemic in America and Europe is defined as a significant increase, since 1981, of 30 previously known diseases (Table 1) affecting mostly 25 to 44 year old men and some (10%) women 3-7 . In America these cases have shot up from negligible numbers in this age group in the 1970s to annually about 50,000 to 75,000 patients now 3 (Fig. 1). Because Kaposi’s sarcoma rose from an almost non-existent background of about 50 cases per year in 1981 8, 9 to thousands of almost exclusively male homosexual cases annually now, it has become the signal disease of AIDS 3 . It is for this reason that the new epidemic has been accepted as a new disease, "HIV disease", in numerous publications 5. In fact, AIDS in America and Europe is a new epidemic of old diseases that primarily affects 25 to 44 year old males. 2.2. The war on AIDS. By any measure the war on AIDS has been a complete failure. Since 1981, over 500,000 Americans and over 150,000 Europeans have developed AIDS, and the US taxpayer alone has paid over $45 billion for AIDS research and treatment, but no vaccine, no cure, and no effective prevention has been developed, and not a single AIDS patient has been saved 7, 10, 11 . This war has been fought in the name of the hypothesis that the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is infectious, caused by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), and that this virus (i.e. AIDS) is sexually transmitted 5, 12, 13 . The HIV-AIDS hypothesis was announced in April 1984 at an international press conference in Washington by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the National Institues of Health (NIH) researcher Robert Gallo – even before it had appeared in any American scientific publication 10, 14 . For the last twelve years the HIV hypothesis has been international dogma and the basis of all AIDS research and therapy 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15 . According to the HIV-AIDS hypothesis 30 previously known diseases, including microbial or immunodeficiency diseases such as pneumonia, tuberculosis, candidiasis (yeast infection), diarrhea, and classical non-immunodeficiency diseases such as Kaposi’s sarcoma, dementia, weight loss and lymphoma, are all consequences of viral immunodeficiency and called AIDS when antibody against HIV is present 5, 16 (Table 1). For example, tuberculosis is now diagnosed as AIDS in the presence of antibody against HIV; in the absence of the antibody, it is still diagnosed as tuberculosis. 2.3. AIDS facts incompatible with the HIV-AIDS hypothesis. Even a brief survey of the facts of AIDS shows that the proponents of the HIV hypothesis have not followed Feynman’s advice to " put down all the facts that disagree with it": 1) Although AIDS is postulated to be a new infectious epidemic, it fails all epidemiological standards of infectious disease 17 :
Numerous facts confirm that AIDS is not infectious. Although there is no anti-HIV vaccine nor any effective anti-viral drug, the professional literature has yet to describe the first doctor (except for a few undocumented, anecdotal claims 15 ) who has contracted AIDS from the over 500,000 American 3 and over 150,000 European AIDS patients 350 . The wives of 15,000 American HIV-positive hemophiliacs have also not developed AIDS, although HIV is said to be sexually transmitted 21-23 . And since 1984 not even one of tens of thousands of HIV scientists has developed AIDS from exposure to HIV 10, 22, 24. Chimpanzees are as susceptible to HIV as humans, but none of over 200 animals inoculated with HIV since 1983 has developed AIDS 25, 354 . Even the CDC now admits that it "may be difficult to identify [AIDS from contact infection] because most persons with AIDS have had contact with many different people. In particular, drug users and homosexual and bisexual men may have had contact with hundreds of partners that they did not know very well."26 . 2) Although viruses are not selective, AIDS in America and Europe is restricted, over 95%, to fringe groups with life-threatening health risks other than the hypothetical risk, HIV 3, 25 . These risks include the intravenous drugs taken by a third of American AIDS patients, and the many illicit sexual and mental stimulants, and the highly toxic anti-HIV drugs taken by male homosexuals who make up over 60% of the American AIDS patients (see 3. and 4.). The remainder are typical diseases of hemophiliacs and transfusion recipients, that fall into the AIDS definition but represent the normal incidence of these diseases in these groups under the new name, AIDS 3, 7, 11, 13, 25-27 . 3) Although HIV is a long-established virus in the US – because the number of carriers has remained completely stable since its discovery 24, 25, 28 (Farr’s law) – AIDS is a new epidemic in America (see Fig 1). 4) Although only 1 in 1,000 T-cells is ever infected by HIV, and HIV like all other retroviruses 25 does not kill infected cells, most AIDS patients lose T-cells 10, 25, 29-31. If HIV were responsible for immunodeficiency it would act like a single bullet that kills 1000 soldiers. 5) Although dementia, weight loss and Kaposi’s sarcoma are not consequences of, and frequently not even associated with immunodeficiency, they are blaimed on the immunodeficiency virus, HIV 13, 24, 25 (Table 1). 6) AIDS appears, if at all, typically only 10 years after HIV infection 13, 32, 33 . But HIV, multiplying over 100-fold every 1-2 days, has the capacity to produce 10 14 viruses in 2 weeks – enough to infect every cell in the human body. If HIV could cause AIDS, AIDS should appear within 2 weeks after infection 10, 17, 24, 30, 31, 34 . 7) Although pathogenic viruses cause the same disease in all people, Kaposi’s sarcoma occurs almost exclusively in male homosexuals 10, 24, 35 . If HIV could cause Kaposi’s sarcoma, transfusion recipients, like the 15,000 HIV-positive American hemophiliacs or the 3 million Americans who annually receive blood transfusions 25 , should have this cancer. But paradoxically, no Kaposi’s sarcoma has ever been transmitted by transfusion 7, 22, 23, 36 . 8) Although HIV is widespread in American/European hemophiliacs the mortality of hemophiliacs has decreased (until 1987, when most started receiving AZT)22, 23, 37 , that of male homosexuals has increased 3 , and that of intravenous drug users 38-40 and sub-Saharan Africans 41 has stayed about the same since HIV has been diagnosed in these groups. If HIV were the cause of AIDS the mortality of all infected groups should have increased. 9) HIV is claimed to be sexually transmitted in spite of the fact it takes, on average, 1000 unprotected sexual contacts to contract the virus 42, 43 . Therefore, HIV depends for its survival on perinatal transmission, which is 25 to 50% efficient 25, 44 – just like all other animal and human retro-viruses of its kind 25, 45 . It follows that HIV is biologically not a sexually transmitted virus. 10) Although HIV is claimed to be fatal, it is not possible that either a perinatally or even a sexually transmitted microbe could be fatally pathogenic. Such a microbe would exterminate itself together with its host within a few generations. 11) Although HIV is postulated to cause 30 AIDS diseases, it meets all four classical standards of a harmless passenger virus 17 :
Since HIV meets all these criteria with regard to AIDS to the letter, it is a harmless passenger virus. 2.4. Conclusions. Instead of explaining the "facts" about AIDS, the HIV hypothesis generates numerous paradoxes and contradictions. Since there are no paradoxes in science, only bad hypotheses, the HIV hypothesis must be flawed. A flawed hypothesis also explains the failure of the war on AIDS. Even the best and most expensive science cannot produce results in the name of a flawed hypothesis. Therefore, independent hypotheses must be found to solve AIDS 34 . The search for a plausible cause of AIDS quickly leads to the only new health risk that has affected America and Europe since World War II, the drug epidemic. |